Table of Contents
May it please the Court. Appellant President Donald J. Trump is the nominee of the Republican Party for election to a third term as president of the United States after wrongfully being denied being duly inaugurated on January 20, 2020 as a result of a concerted and successful effort to overturn the will of the people falsely to install the current pretender to the Office of the President of the United States to office in violation of the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the precedents of this honorable Court.
That, however, is not the subject of this appeal of certiorari of the case below. The gravamen of Appellant's petition now before this Court is that one of those cases on appeal has egregiously violated the Appellant's rights pursuant to the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Also, Appellant will not ask the court to revisit for a third time the wrongly decided line of cases finding that he does not enjoy absolute immunity.
For Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection purposes, Appellant constitutes a class of one person who has alone been historically disadvantaged by his weaponized prosecution by the corrupt, deranged Beltway Swamp Creatures. This history of victimization and oppression can only be corrected by enhanced due process rights that assure directed verdicts in his favor in any action, civil or criminal during any time before, during or after his terms of office.
… [long winded pastiche relying on history and tradition with special emphasis on the George III Administration]
In conclusion, Mr. Chief Justice and the honorable Justices of this Court, it was palpable error for the District Court to decline Appellant's request to be held in house arrest at his residence during the pendency of his appeal on the many grounds for the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to overturn the verdict etc etc
The basis for Appellant's claim has only to be stated to be self obvious. He is a protected class of one and the adverse decisions against him are precluded not solely from any other grounds but on the prudential basis that he constitutes a class of one. He is, in fact, special, in fact unique. More unique than even Jesus. No one closer.
Being as he is, the Appellant should not be suffered to be consigned to the general prison population. History and tradition, justice and the major questions doctrine all support Appellant's petition that he should be detained, if at all, at his residence in Florida where everyone around him will be his bitch. That is clearly impossible in any other carceral setting.
Thank you. I stand ready to address the Court's questions, right after my client has his say.
