When you find the answer to a question you don’t understand, you can expect to see it again.
A question on datascience.stackexchange asked the reason for a Python syntax error
SyntaxError: can't assign to literalAnother poster had the correct change to fix the error but the explanation didn’t reflect what the OP needed to understand the problem behind the problem, which was failing to be namespace aware – he was trying to perform an operation on an undefined object.
When you find the answer to a question you don’t understand, you can expect to see it again.
The statistical foundations of political polling aren't rocket science. Unfortunately.
compositionality systems or relationships combined to form new systems or relationships
As an analytic data scientist, I want to spend my time thinking about data and ways to extract useful information from them. I can’t do that if I’m spending hours trying to figure out why syntactically valid software won’t compile.
Refining polling models. It's the received wisdom of the ages—don't rely on events that haven't happened yet. On the other hand, don't bring a knife to a gunfight, either.
If the election is close again, recounts will make it unlikely that the election outcome will be known on the day of voting.
What comes of turning legal analysis into historiography.
