History and tradition strike again
What comes of turning legal analysis into historiography.
What comes of turning legal analysis into historiography.
Framing is everything, and in US v Trump, the focus should have been kept on "official acts."
Well, I've got to run to keep from hidin' And I'm bound to keep on ridin' And I've got one more silver dollar But I'm not gonna let 'em catch me, no Not gonna let 'em catch the midnight rider
But, but. God's on OUR side.
Trump is doubling and redoubling down for the same reason that drug dealers spike horse with fentanyl. Users get habituated, and need escalating stimulus to stay in the the outrage zone.
Last time we looked at the wind-up for the first part of the immunity argument. Here we recount the pitch.
Team Trump's brief in the immunity case gets off wrong-footed
Let's not feed baseless rumors just because we want to believe the worst about Trump about absolutely everything
The statistical foundations of political polling aren't rocket science. Unfortunately.
The Oracle of Technocrat has seen a leaked copy of tomorrow's Extreme Court decision on the 14th Amendment kick-the-clown-off-the-car case against The Once and Future King.
Lord Falkland to SCOTUS: When it is not necessary to make a decision, it is necessary not to make a decision.
Every so often, we are chasing leads, if journalists, or falling into rabbit holes if we are tripping on mushrooms, or just clicking our way through. Today: Trump and Smirnov
Sure, he's not too old to be President, dammit. But is he too old to play the role of Presidential candidate? (Gak!)
When you are wealthy, it's on paper, but when you are broke, it's always in cash. (Well known corollary to Murphy's Law.)